Labels for consumer brands no longer make an impression
Consumers only want products that are affordable and functional. According to Kaylie Pferten, the industry titans are having trouble with that.
The industry that drives daily consumer spending is the home and personal goods sector.
It includes the everyday essentials that people purchase, such as toothpaste, shampoo, skincare products, cleaning supplies, and laundry detergents.
These are usually inexpensive, recurring products that are marketed under well-known consumer brands that predominate on store shelves and in bathroom cabinets.
For a long time, the industry has been known for its dependability due to its strong brands and consistent demand.
This made personal goods and household companies a mainstay of "quality" investment portfolios for decades.
Their brands, which were backed by scale, extensive advertising, and gradual innovation, demanded premium prices.
Cash flows were reliable, returns were predictable, and growth was steady. Investors began to see the industry as a secure havendull, maybe, but comfortingly resilient.
The industry is currently facing three different difficulties.
First, as consumers trade down, the emergence of alternative private-label goods like Amazon Basics is gradually weakening the pricing power of well-known consumer brands.
Second, there is a slowdown in the growth of important beauty categories like skincare.
Lastly, businesses are dealing with an increasing regulatory burden, which includes stricter requirements to lessen the environmental impact of their supply chains and products.
These challenges will not be able to be handled by every company, and some are more equipped to handle them than others.
The emergence of private labels has affected consumer brands.
The first issue is a consistent drop in customer loyalty brought on by the closing product performance gap.
In the past, businesses like Reckitt (Strepsils and Durex) and Procter and Gamble (Oral-B and Head & Shoulders) profited from a significant brand advantage.
Customers thought that less expensive substitutes, sometimes referred to as private-label products, just weren't as effective.
Data from recent years indicates that this belief has essentially vanished, particularly in categories like cleaning products where performance is easily compared.
Private-label products now make up over 40% of sales by value in the UK grocery market, while unit shares in basic categories like toilet paper and bleach surpass 47%.
In the US, where consumers are even more accustomed to purchasing non-branded versions, the change is occurring even more quickly.
This trend toward less expensive goods is more than a passing response to price increases. It shows a long-lasting shift in behavior.
According to surveys, households have tried less expensive brands and discovered little to no difference in quality when compared to popular consumer brands.
In recent years, store-brand cleaning and laundry product volumes have continuously increased at a faster rate than branded alternatives.
The emergence of bargain stores like Lidl and Aldi has strengthened this pattern.
These stores deduct the branded tax, which can account for up to 30% of the sales price and is the part of a product's price that goes toward advertising.
In the next two years, Aldi plans to open 600 stores in the US alone, adding to its current 13,500 locations worldwide.
National consumer brands are under increasing pressure to justify their higher prices due to the discount chains' increased coverage.
Online shopping has made this change even more rapid. By leveraging search data to identify product categories where consumers believe branded goods are overpriced, Amazon Basics has emerged as a formidable rival.
Customers are unlikely to select a brand at all once they find, for instance, that a cheap dishwasher pod functions adequately. Paying roughly 50% more for a minor upgrade to a basic product no longer makes sense to budget-conscious consumers.
Private-label manufacturers swiftly imitate new product formats as innovation becomes more easily copied, undermining the long-standing benefit of brand-led R&D.
Change to "recession glam".
The second issue is a noticeable slowdown in the trend that drove the high-end beauty sector for over a decade.
This is mostly caused by China's declining demand. Up until recently, China had been the primary growth engine for ultra-premium brands like Este Lauder's extremely costly skincare line, La Mer.
Some now refer to this as "recession glam" after the Chinese beauty market shrank by 21.2 percent in 2024.
Value and useful outcomes appear to be more important to consumers than luxury and brand image. Higher prices are no longer the primary driver of growth; instead, volumes and goods that provide observable advantages do.
The steep drop in retail sales related to travel has revealed yet another vulnerability.
After the government clamped down on the reseller market, duty-free sales on the well-known tropical vacation island of Hainan in China dropped by about a third in 2024.
Interestingly, this occurred in spite of increased visitor numbers. The overall number of purchases decreased by over 35%, indicating that consumers are placing a higher value on experiences than high-end products.
Simultaneously, domestic Chinese beauty brands, such as C-Beauty, are gaining traction by providing high-quality products at a significantly lower cost. By attracting budget-conscious customers who place a higher value on performance and ingredients than brand prestige, Chinese companies like Proya have nearly quadrupled their growth in just six years.
Younger buyers are also doubting the benefits of shelling out more money for high-end cosmetics. Nowadays, only 14% of American consumers think that better quality equates to higher prices.
A strong "dupe" culture has been fostered by social media, where influencers contrast £15 high-street alternatives with £100 luxury serums.
As a result, so-called "dermaceutical" brandswhich prioritize clinical testing over upscale packaginghave grown in popularity.
Global dermo-cosmetics sales are predicted to surpass £75 billion by 2030, despite challenges in the larger prestige market. In today's beauty market, having a high-end product is less important than demonstrating its efficacy.
The paradox of eco-efficiency.
The third issue is the increasing conflict between what environmental policy requires and what business economics can actually support.
What started out as voluntary sustainability commitments is quickly turning into strict regulations. Consequently, the basic cost of conducting business is increasing.
Taxes on plastic packaging are still increasing faster than inflation in the UK.
There will be a bidding war for materials that are already in short supply as manufacturers will have to fight for a small supply of recycled plastic. High-quality recycled resin often trades at or close to record prices, which inevitably leads to structurally higher input costs.
These demands go well beyond the confines of packaging. Redesigning the production process from the ground up is frequently necessary to meet new sustainability standards.
Global players are forced into multiyear capital-expenditure programs because retooling a single production line can cost tens of millions of dollars.
For instance, Procter & Gamble anticipates restructuring expenses of up to £1.6 billion through 2027 as it makes an effort to adjust.
Profit margins are declining because many of the greener alternatives are just more costly to produce.
Companies are also finding it harder to charge a premium to offset these increased expenses. Strong anti-greenwashing regulations in the EU and the UK now forbid making ambiguous statements like "sustainable" or "eco-friendly" unless they are supported by thorough, independent verification.
Retailers are making these issues worse. Supermarkets are starting to offer their own "sustainable" private-label products, which are frequently significantly less expensive than branded ones.
Price differences that once shielded high-end consumer brands are rapidly closing, which further threatens margins and brand loyalty.
When combined, these factors point to the disintegration of the traditional investment case for household-goods giants.
As consumers' behavior changes and private labels close the quality gap, investors must now discern between businesses that are reviving themselves and those that are managing decline.
Strategy, not size, will determine who wins. The biggest companies in the sector are being forced to re-engineer their products in order to maintain their quality investment status. This frequently entails switching from generic home care products to more specialized markets like dermatology, hygiene, and science-based cosmetics.
These are fields where entry barriers are still provided by efficacy, regulation, and intellectual property.
The real factors influencing long-term value in today's market are not just size; agility, scientific credibility, and the capacity to handle ever-more-complex regulations are also important.
The titans of the consumer brand industry.
The biggest company of its kind in the world, Procter & Gamble is going through a phase of slow expansion.
Net sales stayed steady at £84.3 billion in the fiscal year of 2025, with organic sales growth of only 2 percentmuch less than the 45 percent it consistently produced in previous years.
In an effort to offset the growing expenses of retooling its operations to comply with more stringent regulations, the company is using a £3.02 billion annual productivity drive to preserve its 22% operating margin. New tariffs will also cost the company £400 million.
It is dependable, though, because of its wide range of products that cover several market sectors. A strong dividend is supported by a high free cash-flow yield as a result. Procter & Gamble's investment case is still based more on defensive stability than rapid expansion.
In a similar vein, Unilever is narrowing its focus with its "Growth Action Plan 2030," which favors 30 so-called power brands in the food and personal goods categories.
Dove is the best-selling brand. The business has long led social initiatives and is especially committed to cutting back on plastic usage.
The company has acknowledged that it will miss a number of plastic reduction milestones and that private labels and new product launches pose a threat, but it is making significant marketing investments to set its products apart.
Beauty brands.
With a rise in like-for-like sales growth, LOral is the industry leader going into 2026. Its dermatological beauty division, which now serves as the group's main growth engine and houses Maybelline and Garnier, is the driving force behind this success. With brands like SkinCeuticals, it has attempted to lessen the slowdown in the important Chinese market.
The company holds a dominant position in the highly profitable and well-defended industries of professional haircare and high-tech fragrances. Additionally, it has been actively promoting its sustainability credentials.
With its dermatological companies, Eucerin and Aquaphor, as well as a new line of epigenetic serums, Beiersdorf is pursuing a similar course and doing well. The focus now is on "skin longevity" rather than cosmetic anti-aging products, leveraging science that seeks to maintain skin function at a biological level instead of merely covering up the symptoms of aging.
Although there are still worries about the long-term prospects for the Chinese market, its luxury segment has recently resumed growth after initially facing pressure in China.
While expanding higher-margin, premium lines, Beiersdorf has maintained its mass-market dominance by shifting its portfolio toward faster-growing segments.
In the end, Beiersdorf is overshadowed by Los Angeles, its much bigger rival. It is much more reliant on China and Europe and has a less balanced product line.
The tales of turnaround.
Reckitt is streamlining its holdings. The majority of the company's vital home division was sold to private equity last year. Brands like Air Wick and Cillit Bang were part of the divested company. The group feels that its brand value is stronger when it focuses on consumer health and hygiene, which is made possible by the move.
It will be able to concentrate on "power brands" like Lysol and Durex, which have larger profit margins, thanks to this calculated withdrawal from commoditized home care categories. In the interim, the shares will be supported by a one billion pound share buyback program.
Following a nearly 90 percent drop in shares between 2022 and 2025, Este Lauder is also making an effort to recover. Rebuilding margins through operational efficiencies is the goal of the group's "Profit Recovery and Growth Plan". Additionally, it represents a deliberate move away from the aspirational middle class and toward luxury labels like La Mer. Additionally, it advertises brands on Amazon in an effort to draw in younger, budget-conscious customers.
The experts.
With a market share of over 40%, Colgate-Palmolive remains the market leader in toothpaste worldwide. In order to combat the threat of private-label brands, it employs analytics to sharpen its prices and has continuously been ranked among the best-run companies in the industry.
In a slow North American market, the company is depending on its "Strategic Growth and Productivity Plan" to make money, as its organic growth has been 1.2 percent in recent years.
By concentrating on its core baby and feminine care categories, where the brand value is highest, Kimberly-Clark is implementing a high-stakes pivot to spur growth.
In an effort to reach a 40 percent gross margin and an operating margin of up to 20 percent by the end of the decade, it is selling lower-margin segments. However, there is still pressure on short-term profitability, and its products are among the most vulnerable to lower-cost alternatives.
Henkel, the German company that owns Persil, has merged its consumer brands divisions to increase profitability. Despite navigating a difficult global market, the company's focus on its top ten brands has stabilized organic sales growth.
Even though they do not own half of the company, the Henkel family still has complete control over it. Cheaper substitutes also pose a threat to the sizable adhesive division, which includes brands like Loctite and Pritt-Stick.
British candidates.
PZ Cussons has battled for a long time. It is largely dependent on the underperforming Nigerian economy. The shares are extremely cheap because investors are tired of turnaround plans, despite management's proactive efforts to reorganize the portfolio to the more profitable brands.
McBride has become a significant beneficiary of private-label goods in the interim. Supermarkets are among the third parties for whom it manufactures these. Having struggled for many years, McBride comes into 2026 in a strong position after surpassing its net debt target and restoring dividends.
The top consumer brands to purchase right now.
Unilever (LSE: ULVR) appears to be a solid choice for investors in the UK. It rarely makes a mistake and actively works to make sure that the brands in its portfolio generate the highest profits. Additionally, it has a sizable food division so that exposure is not limited to Dove.
Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG) is a diversified bet on the theme for those who are willing to look beyond the UK without having to adopt any particular stances on the various segments of the industry. Although there is a chance that low-cost Chinese alternatives will reduce its market share, LOral (Paris: OR) has a strong history of creating value and appears to be in a good position.
After a long period of bad performance, Este Lauder (NYSE: EL) appears to be getting back on track. If this keeps up, the shares may soon appear extremely cheap. Due to its persistently subpar performance, PZ Cussons (LSE: PZC) has long irritated investors. Nonetheless, a few respectable brands have room to grow. Similar to Este Lauder, it might turn a profit if the turnaround is successful. Lastly, although McBride (LSE: MCB) has historically been a bit of a dog, the company now appears to be very interesting due to the steady growth of private-label products and a much better balance sheet.
Leave a comment on: How to make investments when consumer brands lose their luster