Although the broadcasting industry has been disrupted by competition from new technologies, its core business is still strong
These are the most profitable investments.
Upstart streaming platforms have "disrupted" the broadcasting industry, making recent times turbulent. A few years ago, a "golden era" of "peak TV" was being discussed as a result of the streamers' competition for viewers and dominance, which led to a production boom.
However, after just five years, the streaming industry's future appears much less promising. Streaming appears to be plateauing, and the anticipated impending demise of traditional broadcasting did not materialize.
People are questioning whether the broader broadcasting format can endure at all in the face of social media competition, let alone the seemingly unstoppable advancement of artificial intelligence. According to Mark Browning, CEO of Zinc Media Group, "they are not abandoning it" despite the fact that people may be switching what they watch on TV. According to Matthew Dolgin, a senior equity analyst at Morningstar, the industry may have gone out of style, but "things should generally get better" for it going forward.
Legacy broadcasting companies shouldn't be written off.
Without a doubt, streaming services and social media, particularly YouTube and TikTok, are putting pressure on what is referred to as the "legacy media"traditional terrestrial broadcasting companies in the UK and networks and cable companies in the US.
According to Quilter Cheviot's head of technology research, Ben Barringer, the legacy broadcasters have experienced all five phases of grief. They first denied that the new formats were a threat (denial), after which they attributed their problems to other elements like sales tactics, the macroeconomic climate, and regulatory actions (anger and blame). Then they either merged with rivals (depression) or launched their own on-demand services (bargaining). However, it turned out that managers lacked agility and were overly invested in a dying industry. Now that we've reached the last stage (acceptance), investors might have to settle for the businesses being progressively shut down while still earning what cash flows are left.
Some are hesitant to dismiss the legacy broadcasters. According to Srinivasan (Srini) KA, co-founder and president of Global Business at Amagi, the primary business of the major TV and cable companies "is producing good content," and while the manner in which it is delivered may be evolving, the underlying demand for it is not. Thus, broadcast companies should have a bright future if they are prepared to change and adopt new techniques. According to Srini, ITV in the UK and NBC in the US have already altered their content distribution strategies and are well-represented on social media.
According to Browning, these initiatives are already making a difference. Traditional broadcast television viewing may have decreased by 4% in 2024, according to Ofcom's sixth annual Media Nations report. However, the introduction of on-demand content through digital platforms has largely been able to offset the losses. In 2024, 56% of all measured in-home viewing still came from legacy media (live channels plus broadcaster on-demand services), which was only marginally lower than 57% in 2023. The broadcasters that have a future are the ones with the "most developed on-demand platforms and with a highly diversified audience", he says.
Streaming services are aware of their customers.
Streaming services available online.
Additionally, streaming services should perform better than anticipated. According to Dolgin, "the biggest services have become somewhat saturated in their biggest markets when it comes to subscribers." Despite this, they "definitely have room to grow" because of opportunities in international markets in Asia, Latin America, Africa, or the Middle East, even though their revenue growth may be slower than the rapid expansion they have seen over the past ten years.
The major streamers can increase their income by simply raising their prices in addition to gaining more subscribers. They have so far succeeded in doing this without losing clients or negatively impacting their bottom line. Of course, advertising is another potentially profitable source of income. With its service that is funded by advertisements, Netflix has experienced great success. By cutting expenses, taking advantage of the scale they have attained, and "being a little bit more disciplined," the streamers should be able to increase profits above revenue at the same time.
When it comes to advertising, streamers have one significant advantage, according to Sonia Baschez, founder of Bend Growth Co., a startup marketing consultancy. In a manner not possible for traditional television companies, they have created advertising platforms that make it much easier for them to determine exactly who is watching each show. This allows advertisers to target specific demographics. Baschez's clients are increasingly spending their budgets on streaming services, with the exception of major events like the World Cup or awards ceremonies, which still tend to draw sizable crowds.
Theaters are reopening.
Luxurious seats, red lighting, and an empty modern movie theater.
There may still be some hope for the film industry as well. Randeep Somel, deputy fund manager at MandG Investments, notes that it has clearly struggled in recent years, in part because the window of exclusivity (between films appearing on cinema and then on TV) has narrowed. Nowadays, you can watch almost any movie you want on demand in the convenience of your own home without being constrained by the movie theater's schedule. A cost-of-living crisis also makes going to the local movie theater seem less appealing, and parents no longer leave their kids at the movies while they shop due to the demise of big American shopping malls.
However, it is indisputable that you cannot have the same experience at home as you can on the big screen, and many movie theaters have started to acknowledge that they are now essentially in the hospitality industry as much as the entertainment industry. As a result, both the seats and the venues are now of higher quality. Even though our perspective on movies has evolved, going to the movies can still be a great experience.
Indeed, according to Matt Celia, co-founder and creative director of Light Sail VR, "people are starting to crave that human interaction a bit more as our lives become more entrenched in the digital world, and there's still something very magical about the cinema experience that a lot of people still really connect with." The increasing popularity of music concerts and experiences like the Las Vegas Sphere could serve as a great source of inspiration (and solace) for movie chains. There must, of course, be something worthwhile to see if movie chains are to endure and prosper. It's the studios' responsibility to create movies that people want to see, not the audience's, and it's becoming more and more clear that making superhero movies with big bangs and special effects won't be sufficient in the future. However, as evidenced by the box office success of numerous independent films, there are still plenty of people who enjoy movies, and you can still find theaters with long lines of patrons waiting to see classic movies. If cinema can get its offering right, it has a future.
According to Baschez, some of the largest streaming services are also able to maximize the appeal of their own content by utilizing their technology. For instance, Apple made significant profits from selling advertising space on the cars in the movie after spending about £300 million to produce F1: The Movie. In a similar vein, Amazon has identified well-known authors "and then directly approached them to see whether they would be willing to turn their bestsellers into a movie or TV series" using its understanding of book sales.
Brad Pitt and Damson Idris are present at the European premiere of Formula One: The Movie at Cineworld in Leicester sq\..
Brad Pitt and Damson Idris in Leicester sq\. at a film premiere.
AI's growth.
The development of artificial intelligence (AI) is the major issue at hand. Some claim that it is already drastically changing the film and television industries, particularly at the lower end. According to Amir Ahmed, operations manager at Sugarland, a London-based company that rents out film and video equipment, producers are already using AI to create all the backgrounds. With AI, film shoots that used to cost a lot of money for design, location permits, travel days, and many other things can now be completed more quickly and affordably.
But there is still a long way to go before the technology endangers the entire industry. AI in general has been around for a while, as Somel of M&G notes. For many years, Pixar has been using computer-generated imagery (CGI) to replace animation in movies like Toy Story without significantly diminishing the role of studios. That is unlikely to change. As Somel argues, would Sky have been willing to pay such a premium for ITV if it thought that the future was one of AI-generated content?
Technical directors use a process called modeling to create characters and sets in the computer.
The CEO of Seeker Music, Evan Bogart, is similarly upbeat about the ongoing demand for professionally produced content. Despite the fact that AI can now create "quite good" music, he claims to have "never heard an AI-created track that has genuinely made me cry" based on his experience in the music industry, which many see as a goldmine for television and film. He should know what he's talking about since he contributed to the creation of hits that won awards for musicians like Beyonc, Rihanna, and Eminem. Younger people are also becoming more and more anti-AI, claiming that they do not want their music produced by a computer. There is hope for the future.
According to Bogart, the music and film industries are swiftly figuring out how to handle the disruption posed by AI after learning from the events surrounding Napster and illicit downloads in the 2000s. Defensive tactics like "putting a stop to the bad actors and making sure that regulations and guardrails are in place and that artists and producers are protected" will be part of this.
Longer term, though, it will also entail forming alliances and agreements with AI firms in order to direct the technology toward fields where it can actually increase productivity.
According to Browning, intellectual property will become more significant in an AI-driven world rather than less, particularly if it is in a format that is difficult to replicate. Brandsincluding those of the platform and production companywill become increasingly significant. According to Beringer, businesses with "strong and recognisable intellectual property" will be especially well-positioned "to dictate the future of how AI is used within the entertainment industry."
It's possible that the TV's demise was overstated.
Therefore, it would seem premature to say that we have moved past the "peak TV" era and into a period of controlled decline. According to Pat Murphy, founder and CEO of the advertising company Murphy Cobb & Associates, "people have predicted the death of television for the last 30 years." It would be more accurate to state that a video that is "everywhere on every screen and in every format" has won. "We've not reached peak content and certainly not peak demand" even though "peak channels" may have passed. Indeed, people are consuming more video content today than they ever have before "and that's just going to keep on growing".
According to Willie Roberson, managing director of FGS Global, which provides advice to some of the top media, entertainment, and financial organizations in the world, people are in "constant search of community, and when the community building is real, the medium almost doesn't matter." For instance, TV viewership records for broadcast sports are constantly being broken. Therefore, even though the media environment may be more "fragmented" than it once was, businesses will still need to use a multi-channel strategy that includes television. In general, the winning businesses "will know how to build and sustain community no matter where it goes, but won't just have the biggest budgets."
Universal Pictures' "The Odyssey" premiere.
The top investments to purchase right now.
We examine some of the top options for investors in this industry.
In addition to being one of the major winners in the television industry and the larger entertainment sector, Netflix (Nasdaq: NFLX) is regarded as a technology stock and a member of the "FAANG" (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, and Google) phenomenon. Its shares have fallen by around a half over the last year, says Ben Barringer, head of Technology Research at Quilter Cheviot, but Netflix is "now a scaled player with a broad and strong content slate" which bodes well for the future. There should be "further scope for Netflix to expand its subscriber base internationally" since it is "exploring new markets at the same time such as sports, gaming, and merchandise." Even with double-digit revenue growth, Netflix is only trading at 19 times its 2027 earnings projections.
Disney (NYSE: DIS) has a significant amount of intellectual property, but it is not a pure play media company; theme parks and similar businesses account for about 40% of its revenue. Additionally, it owns a lot of channels, including Disney+, its own streaming service. According to Matthew Dolgin, senior equity analyst at Morningstar, the stock appears cheap considering that its parks division "is worth nearly as much as the market is pricing in for the entire company." Additionally, Disney's media and entertainment division should grow far more than many anticipate. Disney is currently trading at 12.8 times the projected earnings for 2027.
Dolgin is a fan of Fox Corporation (Nasdaq: FOXA) as well.
Dolgin also likes Fox Corporation (Nasdaq: FOXA). Until recently the company has been highly dependent on pay TV and traditional programming, both of which are in structural decline. Its decision to buy streaming service Roku caused the shares to plunge over concerns that it overpaid, but Dolgin thinks that the deal not only gives Fox access to a "great business", but also diversifies Fox's revenue stream, while giving it a platform for distributing its broadcasting once pay TV is no longer economical. Fox trades at 9.6 times 2027 earnings and on a dividend yield of 1.1 percent.
Another conglomerate worth considering is Comcast Corporation (Nasdaq: CMCSA). Comcast provides broadband, but also owns a media and entertainment business, including film studios, theme parks and various television companies, including Sky. Last month it announced plans to split the company into two separate firms: Comcast and NBCUniversal. This is a "logical move", says Randeep Somel of M&G Investments, which could unlock value for shareholders, as the broadband business "has been seen as a drag on the rest of the company". Even though Comcast's revenue has continued to grow, the shares trade at a bargain-basement 6.5 times 2027 earnings, and offer a dividend yield of 5.83 percent.
Film lovers' enthusiasm for spectacular films will be good for IMAX (NYSE: IMAX). It specialises in large, immersive cinema screens, appearing in 1,798 multiplex locations in 91 territories. Revenue has been growing at a strong rate of around 13 percent a year since 2021, and is expected to keep on growing thanks to the release of films such as Chris Nolan's The Odyssey, which was shot on an IMAX camera. After a rocky few years in the aftermath of the pandemic, IMAX is now profitable and trades at 19.7 times expected 2027 earnings.
Until recently the company has been highly dependent on pay TV and traditional programming, both of which are in structural decline. Its decision to buy streaming service Roku caused the shares to plunge over concerns that it overpaid, but Dolgin thinks that the deal not only gives Fox access to a "great business", but also diversifies Fox's revenue stream, while giving it a platform for distributing its broadcasting once pay TV is no longer economical. Fox trades at 9.6 times 2027 earnings and on a dividend yield of 1.1 percent.
Leave a comment on: How to profit from the broadcasting boom now that the show has begun